Username:  
Password:     


Forums
Go to forums

Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 13,547
» Latest member: makon.10
» Forum threads: 1,148
» Forum posts: 6,565

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 13 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 13 Guest(s)

Latest Threads
Trade deficits are ALWAYS...
Last Post: Supposn
01-22-2012 05:04 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 47
Buffett’s concept” an eco...
Last Post: Supposn
01-08-2012 07:38 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 569
A mini-tutorial for some ...
Last Post: kowalskil
01-03-2012 12:17 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 107
From the Middle East to t...
Last Post: shweta.tiwari
12-28-2011 09:37 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 613
Do you support the Keysto...
Last Post: shweta.tiwari
12-28-2011 09:35 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 870
United Nations of Earth
Last Post: shweta.tiwari
12-28-2011 09:33 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 368
Too good to be true?
Last Post: shweta.tiwari
12-28-2011 09:29 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 221
Paradise, an ideal place ...
Last Post: shweta.tiwari
12-28-2011 09:25 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 480
Pros and cons of the memb...
Last Post: shweta.tiwari
12-28-2011 09:22 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 3462
What makes US pushing the...
Last Post: smallfrog
12-27-2011 12:08 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 702

 
  Another spam cleanup done
Posted by: Per - 09-01-2011 07:29 AM - Replies (4)

Hi again. After a nice relaxing vacation I come back to see the forum infested with spam, once again. Hopefully I've caught most of it now, and will keep a close watch from now on.

If you see any spam, don't hesitate to use the "Report" button to help me find it.

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  Libya and other oppressed nations
Posted by: philbell - 03-21-2011 09:57 PM - Replies (1)

It has been a while, but here goes.

What do people make of the attacks on Libya? Fair enough they are trying to prevent civilians getting hurt and giving them a chance to protest, although a little bit late in that respect. Gaddafi has been heavy handed with 'his' people, but has been for over 40 years. Why the sudden change of tact?

Bahrain is in a similar position yet everybody turns a blind eye, is this right?

Iran was threatened and is kinda under threat still, yet Saudi oppression is accepted, why?

China has been probably the worst offender in this respect, yet nobody would risk bombing there would they?

There are many other cases around the world that are ignored, Zimbabwe for example, yet Libya has been singled out. Is this purely down to oil? Or is there more to it?

I really don't have any clue what is going on. Why would we start things now when they are too late? The no-fly zone might have worked weeks ago but now it seems to have created a no win situation for anybody. Even threatening to bomb artillery moving to attack civilians might have been warranted a couple of weeks ago, and attack if needed. Now it is in position it makes the whole situation a different game.

Give the civilians the freedom to protest in safety would have been good and valid but the current situation just seems to be a mess. Nobody seems to know what the aims are, so what are they fighting for?

Like I say its been a while...............

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  Spring cleaning
Posted by: Per - 08-02-2010 03:02 PM - Replies (2)

Or well, maybe not spring but a good cleaning anyway. Most of the recent spam has now been removed and the forum software updated, so hopefully we won't be bothered by spam anymore.

Unfortunately I had to use some pretty aggressive methods, due to the sheer amount of crap. This means that some new innocent users may have been banned. If you are one of them, please register a new account and pm me if you want your old account unbanned.

Thank you for your patience.

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  Congress set to brush Delhi
Posted by: ls2009 - 05-16-2009 07:39 AM - No Replies

Congress today appeared to be set for a clean sweep in Delhi with latest trends showing that its candidates were ahead in all the
seven Lok Sabha constituencies.

Union minister Kapil Sibal was leading by 47,152 votes over his nearest BJP rival Vijender Gupta in Chandni Chowk constituency from where he was elected last time.

Another Union minister Ajay Maken was ahead of his nearest BJP rival Vijay Goel by 8,013 votes in New Delhi seat.

Chief minister Sheila Dikshit's son Sandeep, who is contesting from East Delhi, had a comfortable lead over his nearest BJP rival ace cricketer Chetan Chouhan by 28,532 votes.

Sitting MLA Mahabal Mishra is ahead of Delhi Leader of Opposition Jagdish Mukhi by 33,039 votes in West Delhi seat, which is considered a BJP stronghold.

DPCC chief J P Aggarwal, who replaced senior Congress leader Jagdish Tytler from North-East Delhi seat after his candidature became a controversy, was leading over his BJP rival B L Sharma by 29,537 votes.

Interestingly, in North-East seat, Haji Dilshad Ali, the BSP candidate who withdrew from the race in favour of Congress two days ahead of the polling, has polled 8,862 votes.

In South Delhi, Ramesh Kumar, who replaced his brother and Congress leader Sajjan Kumar, is leading against his BJP's Ramesh Bidhuri by 9,117 votes.

Sitting Congress MP Krishna Tirath is also leading in North-West Delhi seat over her nearest BJP rival by 4,346 votes.
for more info:http://www.indyalive.com

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  Welcome to the new letpoliticstalk.com
Posted by: Per - 01-21-2009 10:07 AM - Replies (4)

Hi all forum members,

Let politics talk will go through some changes in the near future, but overall it will look the same. The main goal right now is to get more people to visit this great forum, and I have a strategy for this (hint seo). I see alot of potential in Let politics talk and that's why I want to bring it to new heights.

Feel free to drop a comment if you have any questions.

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  New Owners
Posted by: matt - 01-15-2009 09:56 PM - Replies (2)

Hi all,

Let Politics Talk has now been sold to a owner who can take it to the next dimension. I am sorry over the past year or so I put such little into it. I didn't have the time but I couldn't see this place die.

The current owner wants to bring this place to new heights! I wish you well and our new owners well.

Thank you,
Matthew

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  Future Energy Sources
Posted by: philbell - 11-15-2008 12:29 AM - Replies (6)

[/u]There has to be a decision on future energy sources made soon before it is too late, but no matter what is suggested the bloody green brigade campaigns against it!! So what the hell can be done?

Nuclear Power is a no no to them.

Coal/Gas power stations pump out too much co2 (fossil fuels are running out anyway) so they are out of the question as a long term fix.

Wind power, which the green brigade once pushed as an answer, are now not the answer as they cause 'blots on the landscape' and noise pollution to those close by. The offshore windfarms seem to cause even more outrage to peoples as their view is ruined etc etc.

Wave power is opposed as it causes other environmental issues!!

Where the hell do they expect the power to come from? I am still trying to perfect my perpetual motion generator but until this is finished I can't see any other viable option other than one of the above.

I live in an area where all of the above affect me personally to a point.

I work in a unique office that looks out over the Irish Sea right on to a large windfarm. Does it spoil my view? No not really, instead of seeing nothing but water and clouds there are little tiny windmills on the horizon. Breaks up the monotony of nothingness to be honest!! On the hills around my area there are wind farms, they do look out of place at first but then you get used to them and not notice them, at night they lurk out of the gloom and remind me of Triffids (for some strange reason) and if you are right up close to one they are noisy. The noise is no more than a big oak tree would make in the wind with the wind rustling through its leaves though, yet they don't want all the trees felled!! Maybe paint them (the windmills not the trees) a colour that will blend in rather than white, but other than that there is no problem.

Tidal power has been a local ambition by some. Build a barrage across an estury that harnesses power 24/7simply by the movement of the moon. How green is that? Yet this might cause a problem for wildlife!! It is not like a dam blocking off all of the water it is simply like a series of underwater windmills using the moving tide instead of the wind, out of sight and all that!! But oh no that is not good enough either, a cockle mioght get injured, despite the fact that if it doesnt the Chinese will just bag it up to sell to us for 10 times they were paid to collect it.

The oil/gas/coal option is out of the question as this nation does not have enough to support itself and due to the co2 problems that causes.

Nuclear power is not wanted by most people in their back yards but I think is accepted by many now as the solution for the moment. Obviously the green brigade won't have this either but I live within 40 miles of Sellafield, which although doesnt have a power station (I don't think) processes all the waste from all of the others and is more of a risk than the power stations themselves. Since the accident at Windscale (Sellafield)in the 50's there have been no major problems in the UK with Nuclear power.

What do people think on this matter? What should the answer be? All I know is that I am sat in a freezing cold house that 2 years ago was toasty hot. I simply cannot afford to heat it now and want an affordable solution that will get me and my kids warm again in the winter.

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  US bailout
Posted by: philbell - 09-30-2008 11:04 PM - Replies (1)

What do you think of the failed US bailout? Should it have gone through or not? One side listened to the voters and the other listened to the Bankers.

I can understand both arguments, and I am no expert in any area here, but surely if things continue without the bailout then the markets will crash, hence will pensions and housing and make things worse.

I have been asking for years why people are stupid enough to pay so much for houses and why banks let them. It has been so obvious that the market was going to hit a point where it would all fall through for the last 4 years, yet people were stupid enough to pay the prices asked and banks were even stupider to let them borrow money that was alwaysys going to end in negative equity!!!

WHY??

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  What is goging on?!?
Posted by: philbell - 09-29-2008 11:43 PM - Replies (1)

How have banks and bankers gone to the wall so quickly? For years upon years they have been making billions, yet in a few months they are going bust!! What happened to all of the profits? I am guessing that they have been drained off by the bosses and shareholders that have been reaping the rewards.

So if for all these years they are rewarded by doing such a fantastic job, how come they are not liable for the failures?? Surely the fat cat salaries they have taken should be paid back. After all it is their actions that got them the bonuses and hence it is a 2 way street and surely they should be made liable for their faults. It is the same for all of the top company CEO's. They have to take the rough with the smooth.

Ok we are in a global mess but these people got us there and should pay the biggest price. I am all for these government bailouts if they really will get the economy stabilised, BUT the people that are responsible, the heads of the banks, companies etc that have made millions should be personally liable and be forced to pay back the 'earnings' and 'bonuses' they have made by bringing their companies to the wall in the long run.

The ENRON and other people were prosecuted in the end, I think there are a huge amount of people that have created this world situation through their own greed, have profitted through it and should now pay the price. They have lived the high life and the rest of us are now paying, they should be the ones made to suffer in destitution, not me and you. Strip them of ALL their assets and put them back in to the economy, do not send them to jail and make that their punishment as they will cost us even more to keep them. Make them pay back for the rest of their lives!! Then maybe the next generation will be that bit more careful and think twice about taking millions in payoffs and bonuses and living the dream.

Print this item Send this item to a friend

  Lewis Hamilton
Posted by: philbell - 09-28-2008 12:21 AM - Replies (3)

Right, nobody seems to be posting at all anymore, yet when you log on there always seems to be several guests logged on. Am going to make a last attempt to get a discussion going!!
Although this is totally out of the things the site usually covers it is an argument that gets people talking. It regards F1 and in particular Lewis Hamilton.
Personally I cannot stand the guy. He is an arrogant tosser who has so much hype that he believes he is the best driver in the world ever. This is far from the truth. There are much better drivers out there, it maybe you or me. Could we ever have the finance to prove ourselves? Unless you have Millions behind you the answer is no. There are hundreds/thousands better that do not have the funds to compete at a higher level. I know of people that have consistently beaten him in lower formula but have dropped out due to lack of funding!! He is far from the best!!

I am from the UK yet I want to see anyone but Hamilton become champion!! I really do not get why people support him at all? What makes things worse is the partisan commentary from ITV and the way they concentrate on the one driver and nobody else!! There are 19 others out there FFS

Print this item Send this item to a friend







Also check:
infrastruktur - Ljusdesign



Contact Us - Let politics talk - Return to Top - Return to Content - Lite (Archive) Mode - RSS Syndication